|
III. Community Demographics and Economic Profile
A. Population Trends
The population of the Humboldt/Del Norte Region is slowly but
steadily growing. The California Department of Finance, Demographic Research
Unit projected that between 1990 and 1995, the population in this area grew to a
total of 158,256, a 11.2% increase. Growth in the two county areas is not even,
however. Humboldt County’s population grew from 116,215 in 1990 to a projected
level of 127,550 in 1995, a total increase of 9.7%. In comparison, Del Norte
County grew from 24,261 in 1990 to 30,706 in 1995, a 26.5% increase. The State
of California’s population grew 8% during the same time period. The region’s
population represents roughly .5% of the California’s total
population.
Table 3.1: Population Distribution
| Zip Code / Area |
Humboldt/ Del Norte 1990 |
Humboldt/ Del Norte 1995 |
Change from 1990 to Most Recent |
| Del Norte Subarea |
24,261 |
30,706 |
21.0% |
| No. Humboldt Subarea |
15,860 |
17,114 |
7.3% |
| Eastern Humboldt |
4,849 |
5,702 |
15.0% |
| Arcata Subarea |
22,300 |
23,884 |
6.6% |
| Eureka Subarea |
46,619 |
51,470 |
9.4% |
| Eel River Valley |
22,135 |
24,378 |
9.2% |
| So. Humboldt Subarea |
4,452 |
5,002 |
11.0% |
| Total Population |
140,476 |
158,256 |
11.2% |
|
| Source: U.S. Census, 1990, CA Department of Finance, 1995 |
Table 3.1 shows the rate of growth by individual subareas
within the two county region. Exhibit 3.1 shows the proportion of
population in each subarea and how it has grown in the past ten years. Eureka is
the largest incorporated city in the region with an estimated population of
27,600. Of this population increase, natural increase (births minus deaths)
added 3,839 (43% of the increase) and net migration added 5,011 (57% of the
increase).1 This increase contrasts with California during the same
period when 90% of the population increase was attributed to natural increase
and only 10% to net migration. (Note: During this period, California as a whole
experienced an unusual pattern of out-migration attributed largely to the
economic recession of the time.)2 The Humboldt/Del Norte region is
expected to grow at the same pace in the next twenty years, with Del Norte
County growing at a faster pace than Humboldt County. Interim county projections
estimate area growth as depicted in Table S3.1-1 below.
Exhibit 3.1: Population Distribution
 |
| Source: U.S. Census, 1990, CA Department of Finance, 1995 |
Table S3.1-1: Humboldt and Del Norte Population Increase Projections
| Year |
Humboldt County |
Change from 1995 |
Del Norte County |
Change from 1995 |
Two-County Region |
Change from 1995 |
| 2000 |
130,500 |
|
31,800 |
|
162,300 |
|
| 2010 |
143,900 |
|
41,600 |
|
185,500 |
|
| 2020 |
156,500 |
23% |
51,300 |
67% |
207,800 |
31% |
|
| Source: California Department of Finance, Interim County Population Projections |
The age distribution of the Humboldt/Del Norte population is displayed in
Exhibit 3.2. The population structure roughly mirrors that of California
as a whole. The percentage of children under the age of 18 is nearly identical,
with Humboldt/Del Norte at 22.4% and California at 22.3%. The percentage of
adults between the ages of 18-64 is slightly lower in the region, with
Humboldt/Del Norte at 65.3% and California at 67.1%. The population over the age
of 65 is slightly higher in Humboldt/Del Norte at 12.3% vs. 10.4% for the state
as a whole. The Sex and Age Distribution of the region is displayed in
Exhibit 3.3 on page 8 and is unremarkable. Exhibit S3.3-1, on page
7 provides an additional method for viewing age and sex distribution for the
region. Both the regional and California "pyramids" are typical of a developed
nation, characterized by a lower birth rate, "baby boom" bulge and a growing
older population.
Exhibit 3.2: Age Distribution
 |
| Source: U.S. Census, 1990 |
Exhibit 3.3: Sex & Age Distribution
 |
| Source: U.S. Census, 1990 |
The ethnic/racial composition of Humboldt/Del Norte Counties differs
significantly from the State of California as shown in Exhibit 3.4. In
Humboldt/Del Norte Counties in 1995, 84.5% of the population were non-Hispanic
Whites, 6.1% were Hispanic, 5.5% were Native American, 2.3% were Asian/Pacific
Islanders and only 1.6% were African American. In contrast, the composition for
California in 1995 was 53.6% non-Hispanic Whites, 28.4% Hispanics, 7.0% African
American, 10.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, and .6% Native American. Within the
region, there are also some variations of ethnic/racial composition. Del Norte
County has the highest percentage of Hispanics in the region at 10.1% and a
lower percentage of non-Hispanic Whites at 78.9%. The Eastern Humboldt subarea
has the highest percentage of Native Americans at 48.0% and the lowest
percentage of non-Hispanic Whites at 48.3%. The other subareas are very similar
in composition, characterized by high percentages of non-Hispanic Whites.
Exhibit 3.4: Population by Ethnicity/Race
 |
| Source: CA Department of Finance, Race/Ethnic Estimates of Counties, 1995 |
Previous | Table of Contents | Forward
© CIRHM
|